Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07

Message boards : Number crunching : Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 7 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Feet1st
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 1755
Credit: 4,690,520
RAC: 0
Message 15116 - Posted: 1 May 2006, 1:47:56 UTC - in response to Message 15071.  

right now the one WU i am doing seems to be going ok its just the progress is wierd and jumps from like 7% to like 24% and doesnt update constantly

The progress has never updated constantly. It appears you have a 2 hour time preference? This is in the Rosetta Preferences. The progress bar updates fractions of a % during a model, then when the model is completed it is truely recalculated. With such a short runtime, a single model is often 10 or even 50% of the work you will do. There are cases with large proteins where you will only get a single model done in that runtime, and so the progress goes straight from 1.xx% to 100%.

Review this FAQ for more info.

Add this signature to your EMail:
Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might!
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/
ID: 15116 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile blackbird

Send message
Joined: 4 Nov 05
Posts: 15
Credit: 93,414
RAC: 0
Message 15132 - Posted: 1 May 2006, 5:27:38 UTC

Rosetta version is 5.07
WU has stopped, CPU time has stopped on 00:27:34.
Thank you for the replies.
ID: 15132 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Golden Turtle

Send message
Joined: 23 Sep 05
Posts: 34
Credit: 22,941
RAC: 0
Message 15224 - Posted: 1 May 2006, 22:23:59 UTC
Last modified: 1 May 2006, 22:25:29 UTC

Can anyone tell me what happened?
4/30/2006 5:33:18 PM|rosetta@home|Resuming result AB_CASP6_t212__456_4028_0 using rosetta version 501
5/1/2006 3:26:37 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/1/2006 3:26:37 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result AB_CASP6_t212__456_4028_0 finished
5/1/2006 3:26:38 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:38 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:39 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:40 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:40 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:41 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result PROD_ABINITIO_1tul__447_97082_0 (CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2))
5/1/2006 3:26:41 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: start failed
5/1/2006 3:26:41 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result PROD_ABINITIO_1tul__447_97082_0 finished
5/1/2006 3:26:41 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:42 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:42 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:42 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:43 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:43 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result PROD_ABINITIO_ALPHABETABAR_1tul__447_97110_0 (CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2))
5/1/2006 3:26:43 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: start failed
5/1/2006 3:26:43 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result PROD_ABINITIO_ALPHABETABAR_1tul__447_97110_0 finished
5/1/2006 3:26:44 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:44 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:45 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:46 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:47 AM|rosetta@home|CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2)
5/1/2006 3:26:47 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result AB_CASP6_t212__458_6648_0 (CreateProcess() failed - The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2))
5/1/2006 3:26:47 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: start failed
5/1/2006 3:26:47 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result AB_CASP6_t212__458_6648_0 finished
5/1/2006 3:26:47 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_2313_0 using rosetta version 507
5/1/2006 7:05:09 AM||Resuming network activity--

Rosetta is fine now.[times are PST]

ID: 15224 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Golden Turtle

Send message
Joined: 23 Sep 05
Posts: 34
Credit: 22,941
RAC: 0
Message 15226 - Posted: 1 May 2006, 22:44:45 UTC

just noticed in my previous message that rosetta vesion is shown as 5.01
even though 'manager' says 5.07.
ID: 15226 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Moderator9
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 06
Posts: 1014
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 15229 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 0:10:19 UTC - in response to Message 15226.  

just noticed in my previous message that rosetta vesion is shown as 5.01
even though 'manager' says 5.07.


These errors look very similar to a file error that showed up on Ralph for a particular WU type. I am sure Rhiju or Bin will be along shortly to provide more detail. The fact that your system has moved on so to speak would indicate that it is a Work Unit issue. The version number error is probably just an error message in the code that did not get changed with the upgraded version release.

Moderator9
ROSETTA@home FAQ
Moderator Contact
ID: 15229 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jose

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 06
Posts: 820
Credit: 48,297
RAC: 0
Message 15231 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 1:54:39 UTC
Last modified: 2 May 2006, 1:55:14 UTC

A new type of error has shown up. (Meaning a "non 107 Type" . )

BTW 107 types are still showing up: When are we going to get help or more information regarding them?


https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=18820267

Result ID 18820267
HBLR_1.0_1dtj_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_13051_0
Workunit 15562229
Created 1 May 2006 11:58:34 UTC
Sent 1 May 2006 16:07:20 UTC
Received 2 May 2006 1:43:43 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Computing
Exit status 1 (0x1)
CPU time 19.34375
stderr out <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version>
<message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
ERROR:: Exit at: .fragments.cc line:722

</stderr_txt>
Validate state Invalid
Claimed credit 0.0674343140710041
Granted credit 0
application version 5.07


This and no other is the root from which a Tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
Plato
ID: 15231 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Bin Qian

Send message
Joined: 13 Jul 05
Posts: 33
Credit: 36,897
RAC: 0
Message 15234 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 2:45:45 UTC - in response to Message 15229.  

Thanks for reporting. I think Moderator9 is right - it's likely a file transfer error and probably just an isolated case.

just noticed in my previous message that rosetta vesion is shown as 5.01
even though 'manager' says 5.07.


These errors look very similar to a file error that showed up on Ralph for a particular WU type. I am sure Rhiju or Bin will be along shortly to provide more detail. The fact that your system has moved on so to speak would indicate that it is a Work Unit issue. The version number error is probably just an error message in the code that did not get changed with the upgraded version release.


ID: 15234 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Bin Qian

Send message
Joined: 13 Jul 05
Posts: 33
Credit: 36,897
RAC: 0
Message 15236 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 2:56:17 UTC - in response to Message 15231.  

Hi Jose,

".fragments.cc line:722" says that Rosetta thinks the "fragment file" it's reading has wrong format. Since all the work units named HBLR_1.0_1dtj_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_xxxxx_x will read in the same "fragment file" during rosetta initialization stage, it probably indicates that the file in your reported WU has crashed or been truncated during file transfering.

We have received successful results for this batch so this is very likely an isolated case. But we will keep an eye on it.

Thanks.


A new type of error has shown up. (Meaning a "non 107 Type" . )

BTW 107 types are still showing up: When are we going to get help or more information regarding them?


https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=18820267

Result ID 18820267
HBLR_1.0_1dtj_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_13051_0
Workunit 15562229
Created 1 May 2006 11:58:34 UTC
Sent 1 May 2006 16:07:20 UTC
Received 2 May 2006 1:43:43 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Computing
Exit status 1 (0x1)
CPU time 19.34375
stderr out <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version>
<message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
ERROR:: Exit at: .fragments.cc line:722

</stderr_txt>
Validate state Invalid
Claimed credit 0.0674343140710041
Granted credit 0
application version 5.07



ID: 15236 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Rebirther
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 116
Credit: 41,315
RAC: 0
Message 15251 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 8:30:43 UTC

Iam running two WUs with HT on my P4, HBLR_xx and AB_CASP6.xx. Memory usage is 300MB but my Task Manager displays 911MB RAM total, seems to be a memory leak of 300MB somewhere (+300MB for XP)?
ID: 15251 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Nightbird

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 70
Credit: 32,418
RAC: 0
Message 15254 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 9:50:39 UTC - in response to Message 15104.  
Last modified: 2 May 2006, 9:59:21 UTC

and a problem : the wu stopped at 33.22 % done.


It might just be a slow spot in the WU. Give it some time.

If it's really stuck, then the watchdog should get it. The watchdog then sends back a lot of information about the WU that is useful to the project.


I did a screenshoot with this wu "not working" (1di2) and an other wu working (2tif)





ID: 15254 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jose

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 06
Posts: 820
Credit: 48,297
RAC: 0
Message 15255 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 9:58:03 UTC
Last modified: 2 May 2006, 9:58:33 UTC

Now I got a "client error" Does this means that the data I produced was not received by you?

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=18820316

Result ID 18820316
Name JUMP_ALLBARCODE03_1tul__468_770_0
Workunit 15562277
Created 1 May 2006 11:58:34 UTC
Sent 1 May 2006 16:07:20 UTC
Received 2 May 2006 9:46:12 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Done
Exit status -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
Report deadline 15 May 2006 16:07:20 UTC
CPU time 8928.046875
stderr out <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version>
<message> - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
# random seed: 1732251
# random seed: 1732251
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400

</stderr_txt>
Validate state Invalid
Claimed credit 31.1240952250415
Granted credit 0
application version 5.07


This and no other is the root from which a Tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
Plato
ID: 15255 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
tralala

Send message
Joined: 8 Apr 06
Posts: 376
Credit: 581,806
RAC: 0
Message 15262 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 11:41:32 UTC - in response to Message 15254.  





The CPU efficiency is a "guess" from Boincview and not necessarily true. If the WU is really stuck (which happens rarely), Rosetta will auto-terminate it after an hour and return the result.
ID: 15262 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jose

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 06
Posts: 820
Credit: 48,297
RAC: 0
Message 15264 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 11:49:28 UTC

This just happened 7 units lost to computation errors in less than 8 minutes. This a verbatim copy of the message log recorded in the BOINC Manager. I am confused and searching for reasons of why this is continuously happening.

To the rythm of "As the beats goes on"...


5/2/2006 7:28:48 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_ALLBARCODE04_1tul__468_770_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
5/2/2006 7:28:48 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/2/2006 7:28:48 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result JUMP_ALLBARCODE04_1tul__468_770_0 finished
5/2/2006 7:28:48 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result HBLR_1.0_1dtj_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_13053_0 using rosetta version 507
5/2/2006 7:29:37 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1dtj_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_13053_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
5/2/2006 7:29:37 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/2/2006 7:29:37 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result HBLR_1.0_1dtj_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_13053_0 finished
5/2/2006 7:29:37 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result HBLR_1.0_1dtj_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_461_13052_0 using rosetta version 507
5/2/2006 7:30:10 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1dtj_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_461_13052_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
5/2/2006 7:30:10 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/2/2006 7:30:10 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result HBLR_1.0_1dtj_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_461_13052_0 finished
5/2/2006 7:30:10 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result JUMP_ALLBARCODE07_1tul__468_2204_0 using rosetta version 507
5/2/2006 7:31:08 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_ALLBARCODE07_1tul__468_2204_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
5/2/2006 7:31:08 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/2/2006 7:31:08 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result JUMP_ALLBARCODE07_1tul__468_2204_0 finished
5/2/2006 7:31:09 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result HBLR_1.0_1n0u_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_14487_0 using rosetta version 507
5/2/2006 7:31:14 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1n0u_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_14487_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
5/2/2006 7:31:14 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/2/2006 7:31:14 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result HBLR_1.0_1n0u_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_14487_0 finished
5/2/2006 7:31:14 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result HBLR_1.0_1mky_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_14706_0 using rosetta version 507
5/2/2006 7:31:44 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1mky_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_14706_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
5/2/2006 7:31:44 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/2/2006 7:31:44 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result HBLR_1.0_1mky_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_462_14706_0 finished
5/2/2006 7:31:44 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result HBLR_1.0_1di2_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_461_15256_0 using rosetta version 507
5/2/2006 7:31:47 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1di2_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_461_15256_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
5/2/2006 7:31:47 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/2/2006 7:31:47 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result HBLR_1.0_1di2_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_461_15256_0 finished

This and no other is the root from which a Tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
Plato
ID: 15264 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Astro
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Oct 05
Posts: 987
Credit: 500,253
RAC: 0
Message 15265 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 11:53:39 UTC
Last modified: 2 May 2006, 11:55:34 UTC

Jose, download and run memtest86+ for several loops (a few hours). See if it finds a faulty memory module. Open your case and look for dust bunnies which could cause overheating. You might also run Speedfan and see what temps your system is at.

tony
ID: 15265 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jose

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 06
Posts: 820
Credit: 48,297
RAC: 0
Message 15268 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 12:05:09 UTC - in response to Message 15265.  

Jose, download and run memtest86+ for several loops (a few hours). See if it finds a faulty memory module. Open your case and look for dust bunnies which could cause overheating. You might also run Speedfan and see what temps your system is at.

tony


Tony and the rest. It is clear now that everything is futile. Another wu JST FAILED. I am going to download one more unti. Shpuld that unit fail, I will detach. I am just at the end of my frustration levels.
This and no other is the root from which a Tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
Plato
ID: 15268 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jose

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 06
Posts: 820
Credit: 48,297
RAC: 0
Message 15269 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 12:07:39 UTC - in response to Message 15268.  

Jose, download and run memtest86+ for several loops (a few hours). See if it finds a faulty memory module. Open your case and look for dust bunnies which could cause overheating. You might also run Speedfan and see what temps your system is at.

tony


Tony and the rest. It is clear now that everything is futile. Another wu JuST FAILED. I am going to download one more unit. Sopuld that unit fail, I will detach. I am just at the end of my frustration levels.


This and no other is the root from which a Tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
Plato
ID: 15269 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Moderator9
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 06
Posts: 1014
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 15270 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 12:10:32 UTC - in response to Message 15268.  

Jose, download and run memtest86+ for several loops (a few hours). See if it finds a faulty memory module. Open your case and look for dust bunnies which could cause overheating. You might also run Speedfan and see what temps your system is at.

tony


Tony and the rest. It is clear now that everything is futile. Another wu JST FAILED. I am going to download one more unti. Shpuld that unit fail, I will detach. I am just at the end of my frustration levels.


Jose,

You have a number of machines, and for the first time I have found the most recent connecting system. I notice that it is a quad CPU system but you have it set to use 1 CPU only. While it may be counter intuitive have you tried setting it to use all four processors? This is a setting in your general preferences.

Moderator9
ROSETTA@home FAQ
Moderator Contact
ID: 15270 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jose

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 06
Posts: 820
Credit: 48,297
RAC: 0
Message 15272 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 12:18:42 UTC - in response to Message 15270.  
Last modified: 2 May 2006, 12:19:50 UTC


Jose,

You have a number of machines, and for the first time I have found the most recent connecting system. I notice that it is a quad CPU system but you have it set to use 1 CPU only. While it may be counter intuitive have you tried setting it to use all four processors? This is a setting in your general preferences.



I have only one machine. And dear Lord, my machine has only one processor. If more than one machine appear it is because of the quirks caused by the BOINC systesm when one has had to reattach to solve problems and the abscence of the merge functions that would give the real picture.

As to the 4 processors...I really dont know what to say...but I doubt that something as obvious as a processor could be hidden when I inspected my motherboard.

This and no other is the root from which a Tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
Plato
ID: 15272 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Astro
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Oct 05
Posts: 987
Credit: 500,253
RAC: 0
Message 15273 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 12:20:55 UTC
Last modified: 2 May 2006, 12:21:20 UTC

Jose, running a boinc project (any) can be a "fortune teller" for your system. Since it runs the cpu at high levels for long periods, it will "test" your system. When errors appear in the boinc projects it can be a signal that it's time to maintain/service your machine. Let's face it, if there is an issue, you'll have to face/find it eventually anyway. Stopping a project will only delay the inevitable.

Now, I don't know if your puter is having a problem or not. What I do see is that you're reporting an error that others are not. Given that it seems to be just you, then it is reasonable to think that it might be your system that needs attention. Running those tests and maybe GIMPS-Prime95, you'll be able to either find the issue, or rule it out as a cause.

Calm down my friend, no need to get an ulcer from this stuff. LOL

tony
ID: 15273 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jose

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 06
Posts: 820
Credit: 48,297
RAC: 0
Message 15274 - Posted: 2 May 2006, 12:28:05 UTC - in response to Message 15273.  

Jose, running a boinc project (any) can be a "fortune teller" for your system. Since it runs the cpu at high levels for long periods, it will "test" your system. When errors appear in the boinc projects it can be a signal that it's time to maintain/service your machine. Let's face it, if there is an issue, you'll have to face/find it eventually anyway. Stopping a project will only delay the inevitable.

Now, I don't know if your puter is having a problem or not. What I do see is that you're reporting an error that others are not. Given that it seems to be just you, then it is reasonable to think that it might be your system that needs attention. Running those tests and maybe GIMPS-Prime95, you'll be able to either find the issue, or rule it out as a cause.

Calm down my friend, no need to get an ulcer from this stuff. LOL

tony


I am calm. Right now detaching and removing BOINC is becoming the more rational of the possibilities. I will have my machine checked up. But, I need the frustration this is causing as I need a callus in my but. I am sad. I thought I could do something useful but, alas all I have been able to do is mwaste my time and yours.

This and no other is the root from which a Tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
Plato
ID: 15274 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 7 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org