Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Moderator contact thread archive
Previous · 1 . . . 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 . . . 18 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
I have to agree with Penguin on this matter and add that it was not so much the word spam but the way it was being presented by the person I have now filtered out. Again, as mod. sense was saying earlier, he was pushing our buttons and being generally disruptive to the community. Not only in word link but in last one to post here wins - the original. His actions lead to a back lash from me and others due to the perceived insult to the integrity of the thread, which in turn leads to a insult to those of us who were having a good time until said user came along with his spam message. Also in wordlink there was no insult or namecalling. It was inline with the words being presented at the time. Perhaps the more conservative types would call it provocative, again it was inline with the words being presented at the time and was posted strictly as fact and a word, nothing more. Wounded ego's have no place in a forum where we the other users are having a enjoyable time. If the moderator wishes to erase the perceived insults, it is within his right to do so. His explanation was nice to read, versus just deletion and no explanation. But again, someone had to bring up the fact that the user in question was being disruptive, which leads to the disruptive messages being removed. Perhaps that is better, so that others do not get caught up in this mess. Now, since we are done with this user and some of us have elected to filter him out of our screens, we should get back to what we were doing....having fun. While I am not going to make a federal case out of it, I will state for the record that there was no intent to insult anyone's heritage, and accordingly the wordlink was not "namecalling". |
![]() Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 412 Credit: 321,053 RAC: 0 |
I think it's wonderful that the project has so many extra resources that they can have a play area for two or three people to have their little word-play games and post-count-pumping last-post-wins threads. Actually, it appears that the majority of the active threads in the Cafe are the personal playground for only two users (who have posted below). Your signiture (sic) proudly boasts about being banned, and being a bad BOINC user. If you were following the Trojan censoring scandal at Predictor, you would recognize this image as support for all those users wrongly banned from that forum. About your comments on the red X, that is a topic which bears further discussion. It's not something I can directly control as a moderator, but I can make recommendations to the Project Team. Perhaps you could start a thread explaining your point and why it is needed in the Number Crunching board. I'm not going to post about this AGAIN on Number Crunching just to give you another chance to whack me down for not posting in the Moderator thread. This is a standard BOINC forum feature that only needs a configuration entry made to point red 'x' complaints to an email account for moderators to look at. Go back 420+ days in this thread to see the discussion, then click the red 'x' youself to see the BOINC provided explanation of why it isn't working. Proudly Banned from Predictator@Home and now Cosmology@home as well. Added SETI to the list today. Temporary ban only - so need to work harder :) ![]() "You can't fix stupid" (Ron White) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
since the filter doesn't seem to work, i think i will reply to poor poor angus's little hissy fit. dude, get a life. we would welcome you if you would be more positive and would quit complaining like a spoil sport. while there are two of us being a bit more vocal than the others, we are here to have fun. if you can't have fun what the ---- are you doing here in the cafe anyway? and if you look at some of the other threads there are more than just two of us having FUN here. so sorry to say this, but take your spoil sport soul somewhere else and let those of us who are here to have fun, have fun. end of story |
![]() Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 412 Credit: 321,053 RAC: 0 |
since the filter doesn't seem to work, i think i will reply to poor poor angus's little hissy fit. So your idea of "fun" is quoting nursery rhymes to each other. How cute and adult of you. How ironic that you advise me to "get a life" and you and your playmate spend your time and 95% of your posts playing silly words games. And then you act like schoolkids running to the teacher when someone tells you your game is childish and a waste of time (not to mention bandwidth and server space). Proudly Banned from Predictator@Home and now Cosmology@home as well. Added SETI to the list today. Temporary ban only - so need to work harder :) ![]() "You can't fix stupid" (Ron White) |
hugothehermit Send message Joined: 26 Sep 05 Posts: 238 Credit: 314,893 RAC: 0 |
|
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Sorry you feel that your forum experience is being interferred with Hugo. I did attempt to delete specific, clearly off-topic posts as I noticed them to remove such interferrence. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
question on filtering lame users i was told recently to add a certain users number into the filter, however i see his posts in other threads i participate in and they are still the same old lame thing as when i first asked in here how to get rid of this user from my viewing. the id of the user is in the filter, but they still show up. is something not working right? i thought the filter would eliminate them from all posts i view. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
whats with this filter rating stuff? -1 and so on? |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
When a user is in your filter list, you should see something like this any time they post: This post has been filtered (rating: 0) and the user is on your ignore list, press here to view this thread without filtering ...is that not what you are seeing? ========= A negative rating indicates that a user has clicked the pink minus sign under the message. In fact, a -1 indicates that of all the users that have voted on that message, one user more pressed the minus sign(-) then pressed the plus sign(+). Check your message board preferences. You have the option of setting a rating filter. It is called "Filter threshold". If a post receives more negative votes then your prefernce, then it will be filtered as well as the users in your list. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
BennyRop Send message Joined: 17 Dec 05 Posts: 555 Credit: 140,800 RAC: 0 |
My filter threshold is set to -25 (default) and greg's id is now in my ignore list. The message with a filter setting of 0 shows up with no problem, but the message that has a filter setting of -1 says that the message is hidden because the poster is being ignored. I'm using firefox 2.0; but this isn't the effect I'd expect from the filtering/ignoring. (Time to empty out my ignore list and set my filter threshold back to where I had it.) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 31 Credit: 169,183 RAC: 0 |
The rating system has also been abused by members of a certain team to try to hide the recruiting post of my team. We had to have several members positive rate the post to counter the actions of that other team. Seems to be a bad feature and possibly for that reason not used on other BOINC boards. Join Team Starfire BOINC Chat |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
This is what I see This post has been filtered (rating: -1), press here to view this thread without filtering When a user is in your filter list, you should see something like this any time they post: |
Nemesis![]() Send message Joined: 12 Mar 06 Posts: 149 Credit: 21,395 RAC: 0 |
So - what's the issue/problem? It sounds as if it's working OK. The post doesn't disappear completely - just the message text is hidden until you click "here". This is what I see |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Sounds like the issue is that posts with -1 rating are being filtered when they do not match the filter criteria. I will try it out my self here. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
BennyRop Send message Joined: 17 Dec 05 Posts: 555 Credit: 140,800 RAC: 0 |
The description of the ignore feature made it sound like someone on the ignore list would have to get positive ratings high enough to hit the emphasis rating to show up. But they show up at 0 for the default settings, which makes the setting - pointless. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Nemesis, certain messages were not filtered before a certain user came to light. since then alot of messages have been filtered to -1 and even replies are at -1. if you have a look over in team synergy, all their messages are -1 filtered. So that is why I ask why the filter if there is nothing wrong with them. I think that Mod is thinking the same as I am, other than I have no idea what the filter limit is or how it works. So - what's the issue/problem? It sounds as if it's working OK. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
positive ratings or not, when you want a person ignored, they should be filtered out of the forum they are in when you go view that forum. That is what a proper ignore should do and not be subject to what ratings system that can be manipulated to suit the person or friends of the persons interest. The description of the ignore feature made it sound like someone on the ignore list would have to get positive ratings high enough to hit the emphasis rating to show up. But they show up at 0 for the default settings, which makes the setting - pointless. |
Nemesis![]() Send message Joined: 12 Mar 06 Posts: 149 Credit: 21,395 RAC: 0 |
The ratings system (+/-) is independent of the manual user filter process in the Forum Preferences. Two different things. You can put a user number in your filter list in Forum Preferences and it should block the message body content of all of their posts on this site. You will still see the header (the post number, date, user nick, etc.) and possibly the signature. So - you can see that they posted but you don't have to read their content unless you wish to. You can also set your rating (+/-) filter level to filter the content of post that have ratings outside of your preferences, such as all posts with ratings worse than -5, or -25. The instructions in Message Board Preferences do lead one to believe that messages with a high ratings level (many +s) will override the manual filter list. Questions about that functionality would be best asked over on the BOINC message boards, as that is where those that program the forum software hang out. The ratings system is a means for people to anonymously rate the content of a post, and has been the topic of much - umm - controversy in the BOINC community. Ratings wars were common at SETI. Nemesis n. A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. ![]() |
Nemesis![]() Send message Joined: 12 Mar 06 Posts: 149 Credit: 21,395 RAC: 0 |
The description of the ignore feature made it sound like someone on the ignore list would have to get positive ratings high enough to hit the emphasis rating to show up. But they show up at 0 for the default settings, which makes the setting - pointless. I guess you should set your emphasis level higher. Nemesis n. A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 412 Credit: 321,053 RAC: 0 |
Does this mean I'm filter-proof? Proudly Banned from Predictator@Home and now Cosmology@home as well. Added SETI to the list today. Temporary ban only - so need to work harder :) ![]() "You can't fix stupid" (Ron White) |
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Moderator contact thread archive
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org