Minirosetta android 3.83

Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta android 3.83

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Usuario1_S

Send message
Joined: 24 Mar 14
Posts: 42
Credit: 1,465,653
RAC: 2,885
Message 86983 - Posted: 5 Aug 2017, 20:14:26 UTC - in response to Message 86968.  
Last modified: 5 Aug 2017, 20:26:41 UTC

Every once in a while I've gotten a long runner, but recently I've gotten a higher percentage of them--12-24+ hours of CPU time even though preferences are set to 4 hours. Running on two android devices, they tend to get up to 98% or so and then creep along for many hours until completion. Credit is the same as if the task ran 4-5 hours of CPU time.


Same here, this didn't happen for a while now, mostly 8 hours or less, mine get to 99% then start going up slowly +.1% every few hours, right now I have 1 of 24 and another 48h, the first 2 on the picture, I don't mind long running unless it looks like a glitch, or a stuck WU, or a malfunctioning one, taking time from healthy WU to be processed, if you could fix this for the time to be adjusted correctly, by the server if the WU isn't given the right runtime when downloaded

BTW: The waiting for a % of the battery to be charge to continue processing is a false stop, but the processing stops every 6 hours or so when I don't turn on the display. The app to keep the Minirosetta awake doesn't work on any device and was discontinued in 2015, at least no more updates, but what I have found on my Huawri Y330 is that the processing won't stop if I go to: Power Saving -> Background Power Intensive Apps and uncheck BOINC it'll run fine, for about 6 hours until Android kills it anyway, my Tab4 doesn't have this option
ID: 86983 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
supdood

Send message
Joined: 3 Aug 15
Posts: 4
Credit: 105,976
RAC: 1,440
Message 87005 - Posted: 7 Aug 2017, 16:18:11 UTC

I had two go invalid after 30+ hours of CPU time. All the long-runners I had contained "Marie" in the name (ex. SR170731_resub__Marie_0013_SAVE_ALL_OUT_504157_688), and I have since then aborted all of these WUs as I see them in my queue. No problems since then, so maybe it is a problem with this type of WU not getting the stop command when it hits the WU length preference.
ID: 87005 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Usuario1_S

Send message
Joined: 24 Mar 14
Posts: 42
Credit: 1,465,653
RAC: 2,885
Message 87031 - Posted: 10 Aug 2017, 20:47:21 UTC

I'm at 99.9% since yesterday on a WU that started slowly increasing 0.1 every 12 hours or so since 99% at 12 hours of processing, and now it's 5 days and 14 hours, this is way out of whack, I really don't like this, this could go on forever the % are not realistic, I have 2 other WUs in that condition, even when I whent to computing preferences and set the running time to 8 hours and then to 10 hours, the other 2 WUs are at 99.6% 46 hours and 99.3% 24 hours, why is this not been corrected, I'm thinking on aborting all WUs that pass 24 hours without finishing at normal rate, they seem defective and nobody gives a crap as nobody come to write anything official on this thread, I'm getting pissed, I want to reset the project in my 2 devices!
ID: 87031 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Usuario1_S

Send message
Joined: 24 Mar 14
Posts: 42
Credit: 1,465,653
RAC: 2,885
Message 87034 - Posted: 11 Aug 2017, 11:40:29 UTC
Last modified: 11 Aug 2017, 11:50:59 UTC

Well Nobody cares even to answer, or to put an upper limit or to even show the correct computation time, and it doesn't have an option to force it to finish and send the "result" to the server and download a normal length WU; I waited long enough I think, 149, 61 and 38 hours wasted on 3 Cores, resetting project
ID: 87034 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile David E K
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 05
Posts: 985
Credit: 2,630,310
RAC: 1,553
Message 87040 - Posted: 11 Aug 2017, 17:12:21 UTC - in response to Message 87034.  

Just read this thread. Sorry. I'll alert the researcher.
ID: 87040 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
srettie
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 17
Posts: 1
Credit: 11,373
RAC: 198
Message 87041 - Posted: 11 Aug 2017, 17:34:15 UTC - in response to Message 87034.  

Hello Usuario1_S,

I am so sorry, this is mine. I'm not sure why this job is failing as it was set up in the same way as other jobs that did not fail and is an incredibly similar scaffold. It is 100% my fault for not noticing sooner and ending it.

I apologize for the wasted computational time. I will be much more vigilant in future.

Won't happen again.
ID: 87041 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Usuario1_S

Send message
Joined: 24 Mar 14
Posts: 42
Credit: 1,465,653
RAC: 2,885
Message 87063 - Posted: 13 Aug 2017, 6:19:47 UTC - in response to Message 87041.  
Last modified: 13 Aug 2017, 6:29:46 UTC

Thank you very much :) I'm happy for the project and people involved thank you again
Actually I don't know what version of Minirosetta for Android I'm running, it won't say anywhere, only the BOINC version, I assume is the latest 3.83, but on my PC is the 3.73, so I'm sorry is this complaint isn't a problem for this version
ID: 87063 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta android 3.83



©2017 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org