126 teraflops...

Message boards : Number crunching : 126 teraflops...

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Gen_X_Accord
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jun 06
Posts: 154
Credit: 279,018
RAC: 0
Message 31393 - Posted: 18 Nov 2006, 23:22:22 UTC

WOW, that is what is showing on the main page right now, Sat. the 18th of Nov. I'm used to seeing 32tf and am impressed when the number gets up to 38tf. But 126tf? WOW. Did something major just go online? Did someone get a bunch of Playstation 3's to work with Rosetta?
ID: 31393 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Gen_X_Accord
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jun 06
Posts: 154
Credit: 279,018
RAC: 0
Message 31394 - Posted: 18 Nov 2006, 23:55:52 UTC

Now its 146tf. WOW
ID: 31394 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Feet1st
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 1755
Credit: 4,690,520
RAC: 0
Message 31396 - Posted: 19 Nov 2006, 0:02:31 UTC

I would bet that they just granted credit to the failed WUs that have been lingering around the past week or two. So, a one-time bump. But indicative of the scale of the project.
Add this signature to your EMail:
Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might!
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/
ID: 31396 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile rochester new york
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 06
Posts: 2842
Credit: 2,020,043
RAC: 0
Message 31402 - Posted: 19 Nov 2006, 3:09:03 UTC - in response to Message 31396.  
Last modified: 19 Nov 2006, 3:11:08 UTC

I would bet that they just granted credit to the failed WUs that have been lingering around the past week or two. So, a one-time bump. But indicative of the scale of the project.

yes ....but the success rate looks to have moved up the same percentage would credit for failed work units do that????????????????/
ID: 31402 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Astro
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Oct 05
Posts: 987
Credit: 500,253
RAC: 0
Message 31404 - Posted: 19 Nov 2006, 4:08:37 UTC

Boincstats still has it at 36.3 Tflops. Wonder if it'll change when the next update occurs?


ID: 31404 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Feet1st
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 1755
Credit: 4,690,520
RAC: 0
Message 31405 - Posted: 19 Nov 2006, 4:09:40 UTC

Well, perhaps a sort of a double there. They're sending WUs that are less likely to fail, and granting credit for past problems at the same time.

Not sure what you mean about success rate?
Add this signature to your EMail:
Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might!
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/
ID: 31405 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
hugothehermit

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 05
Posts: 238
Credit: 314,893
RAC: 0
Message 31408 - Posted: 19 Nov 2006, 5:42:12 UTC
Last modified: 19 Nov 2006, 5:46:31 UTC

0.000 TeraFLOPS now, I guess that it's an error.

It would be good to have that much CPU power, wouldn't it.
ID: 31408 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Gen_X_Accord
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jun 06
Posts: 154
Credit: 279,018
RAC: 0
Message 31409 - Posted: 19 Nov 2006, 5:58:45 UTC

That's not the only thing showing 0, the "credit last 24 hours" is showing 0 as well. It must be an error.
ID: 31409 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile David E K
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 05
Posts: 1018
Credit: 4,334,829
RAC: 0
Message 31410 - Posted: 19 Nov 2006, 5:58:51 UTC

I'm working on a fix now. We had our file deleter off for a while to keep results from recently canceled work units and turning the file deleter back on led to incorrect modification times which affected the stats. I updated the script to use the received time instead which should fix the problem. It should update soon.
ID: 31410 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : 126 teraflops...



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org