Message boards : Number crunching : Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.16 II
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
Author | Message |
---|---|
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
My air-cooled dual core AMD is slowly dying. Is the data still good in this unit? It bothers me that a bad machine might poison the result. How did the following WU validate with those errors? Was it restarting from an earlier checkpoint? Validation is not the same problem here as it might be on other BOINC projects. Any model you create successfully is valuable. That model need not match (in most cases it won't) any other models from any other computer. The validation will be made against the known structure of the protein. Eventually when the success rate is sufficiently high for matching known structures, then rosetta could be used for predictions. The prediction capability is what is being tested in CASP. Moderator9 ROSETTA@home FAQ Moderator Contact |
truckpuller Send message Joined: 5 Nov 05 Posts: 40 Credit: 229,134 RAC: 0 |
Since the running of 5.16 my Rac on 1 of my computers had dropped from 250 down to 225 anyone shed any light as what to look for as to why.This 1 computer is 2500+ barton with 1 gig of memory and i have a 1.6 duron with 512 memory out producing it. Thanks in advance Visit us at Christianboards.org |
BennyRop Send message Joined: 17 Dec 05 Posts: 555 Credit: 140,800 RAC: 0 |
I noticed my RAC fall from 256 to 225 when I ran Ralph. (Ralph scores are seperate from Rosetta.) |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
I noticed my RAC fall from 256 to 225 when I ran Ralph. (Ralph scores are seperate from Rosetta.) Moreover, RALPH scores can be zeroed out at any time. RALPH is a test project and scores have no meaning there. If you are running Ralph it will reduce the RAC for any other projects run on that machine. But Running RALPH is VERY helpful to the project. If you are interested in helping create the next version of the Science application and are not concerned about credits, please join us over on RALPH. Current testing includes a new Mac Intel version of Rosetta. Moderator9 ROSETTA@home FAQ Moderator Contact |
Jose Send message Joined: 28 Mar 06 Posts: 820 Credit: 48,297 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=23001602 t299__CASP7_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_nterm_nohelix3_hom008__643_2630_0 Exit status -2147483645 (0x80000003) CPU time 8925.28125 stderr out <core_client_version>5.5.0</core_client_version> <message> One or more arguments are invalid (0x80000003) - exit code -2147483645 (0x80000003) </message> <stderr_txt> # random seed: 2367371 # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 This and no other is the root from which a Tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.†Plato |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
With the release of the latest version 5.22 of Rosetta, a new thread for reporting problems has been opened here. Please continue to report version 5.16 problems in this thread. But if the issue is with version 5.22 please report in the new thread. Moderator9 ROSETTA@home FAQ Moderator Contact |
Jimi@0wned.org.uk Send message Joined: 10 Mar 06 Posts: 29 Credit: 335,252 RAC: 0 |
My air-cooled x2 3800 is now kaput. Thrashed to death, 78,582.75 Cobblestones since 31st March. A fallen soldier indeed. I'll have to make up lost ground with Conroe... :D |
XS_Duc Send message Joined: 30 Dec 05 Posts: 17 Credit: 310,471 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=22893068 Got stuck somehow yesterday, didn't see it till this morning... Watchdog didn't kick in neither, I had to abort it myself, lost a lot of time on this one. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.16 II
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org